Housing in Brittany

24

Allowing people to live, work and age in their own country

Levrig 2027
Trajectory 2027 – 2032

NB: «For the sake of fluidity and concision, In this text, the masculine is used to encompass all genders.».

Executive summary

Breton has an abundance of housing units. It suffers mainly from an imbalance between available housing units, their uses, their location, their size, and the actual needs of the population. In the coastal areas and in the main employment areas, this crisis takes the form of competition between permanent residences, second homes, tourist rentals, and patrimonial investments. In other parts of Brittany, it is manifested by vacancy, obsolescence, remoteness from services, or the inadequacy of housing to accommodate the aging population.

This situation has consequences far beyond real estate. It prevents young people from staying or returning to Brittany, slows down recruitment, drives employees away from their workplace, weakens schools and businesses, accelerates the aging of certain municipalities, and increases forced travel. It also fuels a sense of dispossession when those who live and work in a given territory can no longer afford to live there.

Yes Breizh proposes to recognize housing as a fundamental infrastructure of collective life, on the same level as transport, health care or education. The guiding principle is as follows: the attractiveness of Brittany can only be sustained if it first enables a dignified and pleasant life year-round.

A Breton housing policy must pursue five objectives:

• guaranteeing decent and affordable housing at every stage of life; ;
• maintaining a permanent population in the tense geographical areas; ;
• bringing housing, employment, services and mobility closer together; ;
• use the existing park before artificially creating new ones; ;
• adapting housing to aging and climate risks.

Numerical benchmarks to remember

Indicator	Value	Boundary and source
Population living on the coastal strip	36 %	Administrative Brittany, CESER 2025
Part of Brittany corresponding to this strip	18 %	Administrative Brittany, CESER 2025
Secondary residences and occasional housing	13.1 % of the park	Administrative Brittany, Insee 2023
Vacant housing	6.6 % of the park	Administrative Brittany, Insee 2023
Production in 2024 reported to the annual requirement	less than 20,000 for 25,000 to 26,000 needed	Administrative Brittany, CESER 2025
Under very intense occupation	36 % of the main residences	Administrative Brittany, Insee 2022
Secondary residences in Saint-Gildas-de-Rhuys	74 % of the park	Commune, Insee 2022 cited by Le Monde

To achieve this, Yes Breizh proposes a coherent devolution of powers related to housing, land, urban planning, the regulation of tourist accommodation, and part of the real estate tax. This devolution would not consist of replacing Parisian centralization with that of Rennes or Nantes. The guidelines, funding, and common guarantees would be defined at the level of Brittany across five departments; their implementation would be organized by life zones, with communes, intercommunalities, countries, lenders, companies, associations, and residents.

1. Housing has become a structuring issue

Yes Breizh believes that housing conditions almost determine everything else: pursuing training, accepting a job, founding a family, caring for a loved one, living with a disability or growing old in good conditions. When housing absorbs an excessive portion of income or imposes long travel times, it reduces the available purchasing power and degrades the quality of life.

The current crisis no longer affects only the poorest households. Active young people, families, self-employed workers, trial employees and a growing part of the middle classes find themselves too well off to access certain subsidies, but not enough to rent or buy in the tense areas. The criteria for insurance against unpaid rent, often centered on the CDI and an income equivalent to three times the rent, no longer correspond to the contemporary diversity of professional trajectories.

Housing has also become an economic issue. A study cited in the Yes Breizh preparatory documents indicates that nearly 60 % of the Breton leaders surveyed consider access to housing to be a major obstacle to recruitment; this difficulty would reach 88 % in the accommodation-catering sector. These results will need to be consolidated by a permanent observatory, but the phenomenon is already visible: a company cannot recruit sustainably if its employees cannot live within a reasonable distance.

Finally, according to Yes Breizh, housing touches upon the human continuity of Brittany. The «right to live in the country» should not be understood as a preference based on origin. It refers to the concrete right, for anyone who lives, works, studies or builds their life in Brittany, to find a place there. The proposed policy is inclusive: it protects the permanent use of housing, not an administrative or ethnic identity of the occupier.

2. An attractive country, but deeply unbalanced

2.1. The paradox of the coast: too many housing units, too little year-round life

Yes Breizh noticed that the CESER of Brittany well sums up the coastal paradox in a formula: there are housing units, but some of them are not occupied year-round; there are needs, but the supply does not meet them.

Thus, in the administrative region of Brittany, 36 % of the population live in a coastal strip representing approximately 18% % of Brittany-4. The concentration of attractiveness, combined with coastal risks and land scarcity, makes every decision-making more difficult.

Furthermore, according to the INSEE, in the administrative Brittany, second homes and occasional housing represented 13.1 % % of the parc in 2023 and vacant housing 6.6 %%. These averages conceal extreme situations: in some coastal or island communes, second and tourist homes can account for half of the parc, or even more. In Saint-Gildas-de-Rhuys, for example, 74 % of the homes were second homes in 2022.

The point is not to condemn all second homes. They contribute to maintaining the heritage, to the local economy and sometimes to a gradual return to permanent residence. The imbalance appears when their concentration, combined with tourist rentals, permanently reduces the supply for year-round residents, closes the shutters for much of the winter and disrupts local services.

The example of Saint-Gildas-de-Rhuys also shows the limitations of a purely quantitative response. The commune has built accessible housing on communal land and reopened a daycare center. However, according to research cited by Le Monde, 15 % of the housing units built in fifteen years in the administrative region were built on the coastal fringe, for a population increase limited to 3 % in that same fringe. Building is necessary, but does not guarantee that the produced housing becomes a primary residence.

2.2. A pressure that extends to the employment basins and to the metropolises

For Yes Breizh, the crisis is not limited to tourist communes. Rennes, Nantes, Brest, Vannes, Lorient, Saint-Malo, Saint-Nazaire and several medium-sized cities are experiencing specific tensions. The Loire-Atlantique region combines strong demographic and economic growth with a high demand for housing, low vacancy rates and strong demand for the social housing stock.

In Brest Métropole, despite sustained production and a policy of urban renewal, a document provided to Yes Breizh lists 7,800 unsatisfied requests for social housing and an occupancy rate of approximately 6 %. Demand is particularly high for small apartments, while the existing housing stock often consists of larger family units.

These tensions reveal a problem of scale. Municipal boundaries poorly describe the real housing and employment pools. A household can work in one municipality, live in another, use the services of a third, and depend on an organized transportation network elsewhere. Housing policy must therefore be designed at the scale of the living areas, while maintaining clear democratic accountability.

2.3. Centre-Bretagne, towns and rural areas: another crisis

In several parts of Brittany, Yes Breizh has shown that the problem is not primarily the soaring prices, but the inadequacy or deterioration of the fleet, the long-term vacancy, the remoteness of jobs and services, or the cost of repairs. Thus, a home that is inexpensive to buy can become inaccessible if it requires extensive renovation, two vehicles, and significant energy costs.

A Breton policy therefore cannot apply a single model. It must simultaneously moderate pressure in the coastal and metropolitan areas, and make the city centers and small towns once again attractive places for jobs and services. Housing must become an instrument of territorial balance, not an accelerator of concentration.

3. A crisis of usage as much as a crisis of quantity

3.1. Produce according to real needs

In 2024, according to CESER, less than 20,000 housing units would have been produced in the administrative Brittany, for a need estimated between 25,000 and 26,000 per year. This scale of production shows a production deficit, but it is not enough to define a policy. It is necessary to specify where to build, for which households, at what price, under what status and with what guarantee of permanent use.

Yes Breizh therefore proposes replacing the abstract goal of the number of housing units with a programming based on six categories of needs: very accessible social housing; social and intermediate housing; affordable private rental; assisted access to housing; housing for students, seasonal workers and young adults; housing adapted to aging or disability.

Programming for Brittany in five departments will have to be established following a common diagnosis that includes the Loire-Atlantique. The figures available today too often come from different areas. The first step in a serious policy will therefore be to produce homogeneous knowledge at the national level for Brittany.

3.2. Mobilizing the existing fleet

New construction is essential in some basins, but the existing park is the primary resource. The Court of Accounts points out that a reduction in vacancy rates can meet part of the needs without additional construction. However, the causes of the vacancy must be distinguished: blocked succession, dilapidated housing, cost of construction, speculative retention, inadequate size or simply rotation between two occupants.

Brittany presents another peculiarity: in 2022, 36 % of the households in the administrative region lived in a dwelling that had at least three rooms more than their theoretical need, the highest proportion of «regions» in France. This underoccupation often concerns houses that have long been inhabited by elderly owners after the departure of the children. It does not justify any constraints on the occupants. On the other hand, it reveals the need to offer desirable alternatives: smaller, accessible homes close to services and allowing residents to remain in the same commune or neighborhood.

For Yes Breizh, a more fluid residential channel would free up family homes while improving the lives of the elderly. It supposes intermediate offers, support during the move, local services and the guarantee that changing housing does not mean losing social connections.

3.3. Renovate without excluding

Energy renovation reduces bills and protects the climate, but it can temporarily or permanently remove housing from the market if the work is too expensive. Aid must be stable, readable, and proportionate to the actual performance achieved. It must also prevent two perverse effects: renovation that leads to unaffordable rent increases, and the prohibition on renting, which transforms a permanent dwelling into a tourist property or vacant property.

Yes Breizh offers a Breton renovation service¹ Bringing together diagnosis, financing, selection of qualified companies and monitoring of works. Priority would be given to modest homeowners, fragile condominiums and homes rented out permanently on a rent-based basis.

4. The human, economic and geographical consequences

4.1. Youth, families and transmission

The inability to find housing delays independence, pairing up, and family projects. It also pushes young people trained in Brittany to leave, while some companies are seeking skills they can no longer find locally. On the coast, the increase in population can mask rapid aging when the migration balance is mainly based on the arrival of retirees.

In Saint-Gildas-de-Rhuys, the population increased between 2017 and 2023 while the number of deaths far exceeded the number of births; half of the population is over 65 years old. This phenomenon is not attributable to the elderly, who obviously have the right to choose their place of residence. It shows that an attractiveness policy devoid of a housing strategy can upset the age pyramid, close classes, and increase health care needs without maintaining a sufficient number of active citizens.

In matters of succession, Yes Breizh believes that inheritance taxation should favor the transmission of wealth from one generation to the next, not from the next generation to the one after it, in order to take into account the aging population.

4.2. Employment and essential services

Essential professions are particularly exposed: healthcare workers, home care aides, teachers, public servants, employees in the hotel and restaurant industry, the construction sector, agriculture, fishing and industry. Seasonal workers face an additional difficulty: their jobs are precisely in the geographical areas where summer rental is the most profitable.

For Yes Breizh, employee housing should not depend solely on improvised solutions devised by employers. Business initiatives can complement public action, but they must not recreate a link of dependency between employment and home. Yes Breizh proposes partnerships between local authorities, Action Logement, landlords, companies, and solidarity-based land agencies, while trying to separate rental rights from the employment contract.

4.3. Purchasing power and constrained mobility

The real cost of housing includes rent or mortgage repayments, but also energy and transport made necessary by remoteness. A policy that pushes households 50 kilometers from their jobs does not actually produce affordable housing: it shifts spending towards the car, travel time, and emissions.

Each housing program must therefore be linked to a program for transportation, services, and jobs. Exchange hubs, stations, and key lines must become preferred places for qualitative densification, with a guaranteed share of affordable housing.

5. Why the current governance is not enough

French housing policy combines numerous objectives, unstable fiscal instruments, and a confused distribution of responsibilities. The central state retains decisive levers – taxation, zoning, aid for building materials, standards – while the local authorities assume a large part of the implementation and local consequences. The Court of Auditors notes that public resources allocated to housing are significant without guaranteeing greater efficiency than in comparable countries.

CESER describes a plethora of rules for the coastline, but a lack of management: the Littoral Act, ZAN, risk prevention plans, SRADDET, SCoT, intercommunal PLUs, local housing programmes and multiple agencies overlap. Small communes do not always have the necessary engineering infrastructure. Frequent changes in rules also make long-term real estate planning difficult, which by its nature is time-consuming.

The law of November 19, 2024 strengthened the local regulatory tools for tourist accommodation: zones reserved for main residences under certain conditions, registration, energy requirements, sanctions, and regulation of changes in use. These advances confirm that territorial regulation is possible. However, they remain dependent on national decisions and unequal local resources.

Yes Breizh believes that Brittany should be able to set a coherent, stable and differentiated framework. Successful devolution would clarify who decides, who finances and who is accountable.

6. The competences to be transferred to Brittany

An organic law of devolution should entrust to Brittany, under the control of the judge and in compliance with fundamental rights, the following powers:

• definition of the Breton housing strategy and its geographical objectives; ;
• Programming and financing of social housing, very social and intermediate; ;
• fixing the zones of aid and real estate pressure; ;
• management of tourist properties and changes in use; ;
• creation of main residence zones; ;
• modifiable taxation on second homes, permanently vacant housing and certain capital gains; ;
• regulation of urban planning, land ownership and solidarity-based land organizations; ;
• aid for the acquisition, renovation and adaptation of housing; ;
• planning of coastal adaptation and relocations; ;
• production and publication of housing data.

The central state would retain, at least during the initial phase, the guarantees related to property rights, credit, civil contracts and general solidarity. Personal aid could continue to be provided by existing agencies, according to negotiated rules, before any possible evolution. The European Union would continue to set the frameworks relating to state aid, energy, the climate and certain financing.

But the principle of subsidiarity would organize the action: Brittany would set the common rights, objectives, funding and tools; the life basins would develop the programs; the communes would retain a measure of control at the local level; the Breton women and men would have comparable information and avenues of appeal.

For Yes Breizh, one Breton Agency for Housing² It would bring together the engineering expertise scattered today without, however, taking away the responsibilities from the communities or the lenders. Its mission would be to simplify and speed up complex operations: land transfer, financial arrangement, renovation of condominiums, transformation of vacant buildings, rural housing, and climate adaptation. It would publish the costs, timelines, and results of each operation.

7. Sixteen priority proposals from Yes Breizh

Proposal 1 – Create a Brittany-wide Observatory on housing in five departments

The Observatory would bring together the data that are currently scattered: prices, rents, vacancies, second homes, tourist properties, social requests, construction, renovation, demographics, employment, mobility, and climatic risks. The data would be published by commune and living area, with respect for privacy. It would produce a public estimate of needs every two years.

Proposal 2 – Conclude housing contracts by living area

Each living-space basin would conclude a six-year contract with Brittany, setting out objectives for each category of housing, the mobilization of vacant land, associated transport, financing, banking offers, and the expected results. The subsidies would be conditional on measurable objectives, but adapted to local realities.

Proposal 3 – Guaranteeing a share of primary residences in sensitive areas

In communes where year-round living is threatened, a minimum proportion of the housing created in new developments would be reserved for primary residence. Communities could define primary residence zones, in accordance with applicable legal guarantees. The objective is focused on the use of the property, never on the origin of its occupant.

Proposal 4 – Regulate tourist accommodation based on capacity

All short-term rentals would be registered. Municipalities or living areas could set quotas, reduce the annual permitted duration for primary residence, subject secondary residences to change of use, and impose compensation in the most tense areas. The compensation model – returning an equivalent surface area to the market annually – would be activated where a study demonstrates its necessity and proportionality.

Proposal 5 – Putting real estate taxation at the service of permanent housing

Brittany could modulate the taxation of second homes according to local tensions, strengthen the taxation of long-term voluntary vacancies, and more accurately align the taxation of tourist apartments with that of professional accommodations. A portion of the land value created by a public decision would be recovered to fund affordable housing and infrastructure.

As mentioned above, in matters of succession, Brittany will ensure that inheritance taxation favors the transmission of wealth from one generation to the next, not to the next one, but to the one after it, in order to take into account the aging of the population.

Proposition 6 – Establishing a Breton land reserve

A coordinated network associating the Public Land Registry, the Solidarity Land Offices, and the local authorities³ , With the support of Breton banks, it would acquire and develop strategic land or buildings. The real estate trust, which separates the building from the land, would be developed to maintain the accessibility of housing in the long term and prevent public aid from being captured by private profit from resale.

Proposition 7 – Produce more social and affordable housing where it is needed

The programming would distinguish between very social, social, intermediate housing and assisted housing. The objectives would not only be quantitative: they would also include the exit price, size, accessibility, proximity to services and energy efficiency. Mixed operations would be preferred in order to avoid the concentration of poverty.

Long-term capital, particularly that of institutional investors, Breton banks and pension funds that wish to do so, could contribute to the financing of social and affordable housing. Their intervention would be strictly regulated: capped and predictable returns, the sustainable maintenance of social allocation, the absence of speculative sales, and governance retained by public interest organizations.

Proposition 8 – Launching a plan to eliminate avoidable vacancies«

After identifying the causes, property owners would benefit from comprehensive support for inheritance, renovation, and rental purposes. The aid would be strengthened in exchange for permanent, rent-controlled leases. Tax pressure or temporary requisition would only be used as a last resort for permanently vacant homes without legitimate reasons in areas with severe shortages.

Proposition 9 – Secure rental access beyond the sole CDI

A Breton guarantee, linked to Visale⁴, The measure would cover young people in employment, self-employed individuals, workers on trial, seasonal workers and people in a professional transition. The evaluation would be based on real payment capacity and support, not on a status of employment that has become a minority in certain sectors. Socially oriented real estate agencies would be supported.

Proposition 10 – Organizing the residential path of aging

Accessible housing, smaller and closer to services, would be produced in each basin. A Breton housing standard adapted to the needs of people with reduced mobility, sensory and cognitive disabilities and the changing needs of the elderly would be updated. A residential mobility service would accompany people who wish to leave a home that has become too large or difficult to maintain. No move would be required; the goal is to offer a credible and secure choice.

Proposal 11 – Create a program for young people, students and essential workers

Brittany would mobilize underutilized public housing, develop intergenerational residences, and organize a reversible seasonal offer. In highly tense geographical areas, a portion of affordable programs would be temporarily reserved for categories responding to an objectively recognized need for service, in compliance with the principle of equality. Breton banks will be mobilized to help young employees access homeownership.

Proposal 12 – Adapt the housing to the decline of the coastline

Coastal risks would be integrated into all urban planning documents. A Breton adaptation fund would finance diagnostics, prevention, friendly acquisitions, re-naturalization and relocations. New constructions would be avoided in areas that will not be permanently habitable. Breton solidarity would prevent vulnerable small communes from having to bear the sole risk of exceeding their capacity.

Proposition 13 – Give the tenant priority when their housing is sold

When a property owner decides to sell a rented property, the tenant would have a priority period to submit an offer at the market price, without the obligation to buy. They would benefit from independent advice and could mobilize assisted purchase, a solidarity-based real estate organization, the support of a Breton bank, or, when several properties are involved, a cooperative project. This right would be designed in compliance with property rights and without permanently blocking the sale.

Proposal 14 – Create a fund for rural, island and essential workers' housing

The fund would compensate for the construction and renovation costs in the islands, the coastal communes that are under pressure, and the rural territories where a necessary operation alone does not achieve financial balance. It would finance permanent housing of various statuses, including for caregivers, home help, teachers, artisans, and seasonal employees. Occupancy fees would remain, as far as possible, independent of the employer.

One component would help young households build or renovate their main residence in their area, prioritizing already urbanized land, vacant lots, and existing buildings. The aid would be subject to a minimum occupancy period and anti-speculative clauses to prevent subsidizing a future secondary residence.

Proposition 15 – Prevent homelessness before losing housing

A Breton prevention fund would intervene as soon as the first defaults occur, a threat of eviction, separation, or exit from social assistance for children, prison or hospital. It would fund mediation, conditional debt settlement, legal support, a deposit, and an immediate solution. No child should be permanently housed in a dangerous or demonstrably unsuitable temporary accommodation.

Proposition 16 – Renovating the condominiums without leaving households alone

Fragile condominiums would benefit from a comprehensive diagnosis, project management assistance, and collective financing solutions for structures, energy, accessibility, and climate risks. Clearer governance would allow the essential work to be carried out while protecting modest homeowners from an unsustainable burden. The Breton renovation service would monitor costs, quality, and the savings actually achieved.

Conditions of implementation

No transformation is generalized without a budget, a roadmap, revenue and evaluation. No objective is imposed without a budget, a timeline, support, and accessible technical solution. No transfer takes place without resources. In the event of failure, the system is corrected rather than maintained to meet a deadline. A code green, orange, red It will indicate the trajectory, but will never replace the figures and their explanation. A temporary increase in an indicator may correspond to a transition or to a better census: each evolution will be interpreted before a decision is made.

8. A gradual implementation until 2032

2027-2028: know, experiment, protect

• create the Observatory in five departments; ;
• harmonize the data and define the life basins; ;
• generalize the registration of tourist properties; ;
• launch ten pilot geographical zones: the coast, metropolises, medium-sized cities, islands and the Centre-Bretagne region; ;
• speed up the work of solidarity housing agencies and the return of vacant housing to the market; ;
• create the Breton Housing Agency and map the fragile condominiums; ;
• experimenting with early prevention of evictions and departures without a solution; ;
• prepare the transfer of competencies and funding.

• 2029—2030: deploy the Breton tools, adopt a Breton law on housing programming;
• implement the territorial housing contracts; ;
• open the Breton rental guarantee; ;
• open the fund for rural, island and essential workers; ;
• experimenting with the tenant's right of priority and regulated institutional financing; ;
• modulate taxation according to the level of tension and usage; ;
• launching the coastal adaptation fund; ;
• coordinate housing and mobility in all structural investments.

2031-2032: evaluate and correct

• measure the effect of the measures on prices, rents and primary residences; ;
• correct the undesirable effects and eliminate ineffective aids; ;
• generalize the successful experiments; ;
• guaranteeing comprehensive support for fragile condominiums in each living area; ;
• submit to the Parliament of Brittany a public report and a new programming for ten years.

9. The indicators of success

The policy would be evaluated using a public dashboard that would include, among other things:

• median time to access social housing; ;
• rate of household effort per living space; ;
• relation between housing prices and local incomes; ;
• part of main, secondary, tourist and vacant residences; ;
• number of vacant homes put back on the market; ;
• production by category and exit price; ;
• number of households benefiting from a real solidarity lease; ;
• social and affordable housing financed by long-term, regulated capital with a fixed cost and duration of assignment; ;
• average distance and duration between home and work; ;
• recruitment in key sectors; ;
• evolution of the age pyramid and the school population; ;
• housing adapted to aging and disability; ;
• permanent housing created or renovated in rural, island and coastal areas that are under pressure; ;
• tenants who have exercised their right of priority and remain in the housing; ;
• evictions avoided, households accompanied before the breakdown and institutional discharges without a solution; ;
• children accommodated in dangerous or permanently unsuitable temporary housing; ;
• Co-ownership accompanied, work completed, remaining cost and real energy savings; ;
• housing exposed to coastal hazards and solutions implemented; ;
• artificialization consumed by the created permanent housing.

A central indicator should measure not the number of square meters produced, but the number of people who are permanently and properly housed.

Conclusion – Making attractiveness a sustainable promise

Brittany is attractive, and this attractiveness is a chance. However, it becomes contradictory when it prevents people from living there year-round, distances the active population, closes schools, and turns housing into financial assets disconnected from their primary function.

For Yes Breizh, the answer lies neither in stopping all construction nor in an indiscriminate «supply shock,» nor in naming scapegoats. It requires a stable strategy combining targeted production, mobilization of the existing fleet, regulation of uses, land control, support for Breton banks, renovation, mobility, and climate adaptation.

The devolution would allow the decision to be brought closer to the Breton reality and finally make the responsible parties clearly accountable for the results.

It would give Brittany the means to assert that a living country is measured first by those who can live there all year round.

Main sources

1. CESER from Brittany, Coastal Brittany: thinking about the future of housing in a constrained space, Synthesis, session of October 6, 2025.

2. Court of Auditors, Ensure the consistency of housing policy in the face of its new challenges, thematic note, July 2023.

3. Insee, Complete dossier – Brittany Region, Data for 2023, geography as of 1 January 2026.

4. Insee, A quarter of households live in very severely overcrowded housing, Insee Première No. 2064, data for 2022.

5. Insee, Tensions in the housing market, Pays de la Loire dossier no. 13, November 2023.

6. Law No. 2024-1039 of November 19, 2024, aimed at strengthening the regulatory tools for tourist accommodation at the local level.

7. ANIL, Strengthening the tools for regulating tourist accommodation, updated legal analysis.

8. Le Monde, Manon Boquen, In Morbihan, seniors make up for the lack of babies, document submitted to Yes Breizh.

9. Working documents sent to Yes Breizh: Housing in Brittany – Can the Bretons still live in the country?, Housing, Accommodation following.

10. Levrig Yes Breizh, previous version, sections relating to housing, taxation, development and devolution.

11. Scottish National Party, On Scotland's Side – Government Programme 2026, May 2026 (affordable housing, long-term investment, tenant priority, rural and island housing, prevention of homelessness, accessibility and condominiums).

Notes and clarifications

1. Any creation of an observatory or agency etc. will have to be linked to the disappearance of at least one other equivalent public entity with the full reinstatement of the staff. Adjustments may be made subsequently.
↩

2. Reminder: any creation of an observatory or agency etc. must be linked to the disappearance of at least one other equivalent public entity with the full reinstatement of the staff. Adjustments may be made subsequently. ↩

3. An analysis of the relevance of maintaining these different entities could be carried out by the Court of Auditors of Brittany (now the Regional Accounts Court). ↩

4. The Visale guarantee is a fully free rental deposit offered by Action Logement. It replaces the physical guarantor to cover unpaid rent and material damage to the property from the owner. ↩

The thematic dossiers of Levrig 2027 by Yes Breizh

• 1. Statute, institutions, devolution and Constitution
• 2. Public finances, budget and fiscal autonomy
• 2 bis. Budgetary analysis France – Brittany 5
• 3. The public service in Brittany
• 4. Health in Brittany
• 5. Disability in Brittany
• 6. Education, training and higher education
• 7. Culture, languages and media
• 8. Breton identity, transmission and cohesion
• 9. Housing in Brittany
• 10. Employment, businesses and economic development
• 11. Economy, trade and mobility
• 12. Agriculture and food
• 13. Sea, coast and fishing
• 14. Energy, climate and the ecological transition
• 15. Digitalization and sovereignty
• 16. Security, justice and defense
• 17. Europe and internationally
• 18. Breton Diaspora and international outreach